front - Wardoon Academy: news and educational platform

Chris Gray Chris Gray

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

2V0-13.24在線考題 & 2V0-13.24考古題更新

用最放鬆的心態面對一切艱難。VMware的2V0-13.24考試雖然很艱難，但我們考生要用最放鬆的心態來面對一切艱難，因為VCESoft VMware的2V0-13.24考試培訓資料會幫助我們順利通過考試，有了它我們就不會害怕，不會迷茫。VCESoft VMware的2V0-13.24考試培訓資料是我們考生的最佳良藥。

VMware 2V0-13.24 考試大綱：

主題
簡介

主題 1

Install, Configure, and Administrate the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section has NO TESTABLE OBJECTIVES in this version of the exam.

主題 2

IT Architectures, Technologies, Standards: This section of the exam measures the skills of enterprise architects and solution architects and focuses on the fundamentals of IT architectures, technologies, and standards. It covers differentiating between business and technical requirements, understanding conceptual models, and logical and physical designs, and recognizing the distinctions between requirements, assumptions, constraints, and risks. Also included are availability, manageability, performance, recoverability, and security (AMPRS), developing risk mitigation strategies, documenting design decisions, and creating design validation strategies.

主題 3

Plan and Design the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section of the exam measures the skills of VMware administrators. It involves gathering and analyzing business objectives and requirements to create a conceptual model. Additionally, it covers the creation of VMware Cloud Foundation logical and physical designs. This includes prerequisites and design decisions related to Network Infrastructure, VCF Management Domain, VCF Workload Domain, VCF Edge Cluster, VCF Cloud Automation, and VCF Cloud Operations. Designs should consider availability within and across availability zones, manageability (Lifecycle Management, Scalability, Capacity Management), performance, recoverability (BCDR strategies), and security for VCF Management Components and Workloads. Workload mobility, consumption, and monitoring strategies are also addressed in this section.

主題 4

VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section of the exam measures the skills of cloud architects and infrastructure engineers and focuses on understanding the architecture of VMware by Broadcom solution. Candidates should be able to differentiate between various VMware Cloud Foundation architecture options based on different scenarios.

主題 5

Troubleshoot and Optimize the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section has NO TESTABLE OBJECTIVES in this version of the exam.

>> 2V0-13.24在線考題 <<

讓2V0-13.24在線考題幫助您通過VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect考試

2V0-13.24 考題寶典由 VCESoft 在世界各地的資深IT工程師組成的專業團隊製作完成，VMware 的 2V0-13.24 考題寶典內包含最新的 2V0-13.24 考試試題，並附有全部正確答案，保證一次輕鬆通過 2V0-13.24 考試，完全無需購買其他額外的2V0-13.24 複習資料。並且購買 2V0-13.24 考題後，享有一年的免費更新服務。

最新的 VMware Professional 2V0-13.24 免費考試真題 (Q88-Q93):

問題 #88
Which design decision helps ensure optimal performance in a VCF environment?
Response:

A. Utilizing a shared storage solution for all VCF components
B. Using multiple Availability Zones to distribute workloads evenly
C. Configuring resource pools to limit CPU and memory consumption
D. Implementing a centralized logging system for performance monitoring

答案：B

問題 #89
An architect is designing a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)-based private cloud solution for a customer that will include two physical locations. The customer has stated the following requirement:
All management tooling must be resilient at the component level within a single site.
When considering the design decisions for VMware Aria Suite components, what should the Architect document to meet the stated requirement?

A. The solution will configure the VCF Workload domain in a stretched topology across two locations.
B. The solution will deploy three Aria Automation appliances in a clustered configuration.
C. The solution will deploy Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager in a high availability configuration.
D. The solution will implement an external load balancer for Aria Operations Cloud Proxies.

答案：B

解題說明：
The requirement specifies that management tooling must be resilient at the component level within a single site, meaning each site's management components (e.g., VMware Aria Suite) must withstand individual failures without relying on the other site. Let's evaluate each option in the context of VCF 5.2 and Aria Suite:
Option A: The solution will implement an external load balancer for Aria Operations Cloud Proxies Aria Operations Cloud Proxies collect data for monitoring and don't inherently require an external load balancer for resiliency within a site. TheVMware Aria Operations Administration Guideindicates that proxies are lightweight and typically deployed per cluster, with resiliency achieved via multiple proxies, not load balancing. This doesn't directly address component-level resiliency for the broader Aria Suite management tools.
Option B: The solution will configure the VCF Workload domain in a stretched topology across two locationsA stretched topology extends a workload domain across two sites for site-level resiliency (e.g., disaster recovery), not component-level resiliency within a single site. TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guidenotes that stretched clusters rely on cross-site failover, which contradicts the requirement for single-site resilience, making this irrelevant to management tooling within one site.
Option C: The solution will deploy three Aria Automation appliances in a clustered configuration VMware Aria Automation (formerly vRealize Automation) supports a clustered deployment with three appliances (primary, replica, and failover) to ensure high availability within a site. TheVMware Aria Automation Installation Guideconfirms that this configuration provides component-level resiliency by allowing the cluster to tolerate individual appliance failures without service disruption. In VCF, Aria Automation is a key management tool, and this design meets the requirement for single-site resilience.
Option D: The solution will deploy Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager in a high availability configuration Aria Suite Lifecycle Manager (LCM) manages the lifecycle of Aria components but isn't deployed in a clustered HA configuration itself in VCF 5.2-it's a single appliance with backup/restore options. TheVCF
5.2 Administration Guidenotes that LCM resiliency is typically achieved via infrastructure HA (e.g., vSphere HA), not native clustering, making this less directly aligned with component-level resiliency compared to Aria Automation clustering.
Conclusion:Option C best meets the requirement by ensuring Aria Automation, a critical management tool, is resilient at the component level within a single site through clustering, aligning with VCF and Aria Suite best practices.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Management Component Design.
VMware Aria Automation Installation Guide(docs.vmware.com): Clustered Configuration for HA.
VMware Aria Suite Lifecycle Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): LCM Deployment Options.

問題 #90
Given a scenario, which design decision should be made to automate VCF infrastructure components?
Response:

A. Use VMware vSphere automation to deploy VCF components on demand
B. Set up custom dashboards in VMware vRealize Operations for resource allocation
C. Use VMware Cloud Foundation LCM to manage infrastructure components
D. Implement cloud-native services for scaling VCF deployments

答案：C

問題 #91
A VMware Cloud Foundation multi-AZ (Availability Zone) design requires that:
All management components remain centralized.
The availability SLA must be no less than 99.99%.
Which two design decisions would help meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

A. Implement a stretched L2 VLAN for the infrastructure management components between the AZs.
B. Implement separate VLANs for the infrastructure management components within each AZ.
C. Select two close proximity AZs and configure a stretched management workload domain.
D. Select two distant AZs and configure separate management workload domains.
E. Implement VMware Live Recovery between the selected AZs.

答案：C,E

解題說明：
The requirements specify centralized management components and a 99.99% availability SLA (allowing ~52 minutes of downtime per year) in a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2 multi-AZ design. In VCF, management components (e.g., SDDC Manager, vCenter, NSX Manager) are typically deployed in a Management Domain, and multi-AZ designs leverage availability zones for resilience. Let's evaluate each option:
Option A: Implement a stretched L2 VLAN for the infrastructure management components between the AZsA stretched L2 VLAN extends network segments across AZs, potentially supporting centralized management. However, it doesn't inherently ensure 99.99% availability without additional HA mechanisms (e.g., vSphere HA, NSX clustering). TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guidenotes that L2 stretching alone lacks failover orchestration and may introduce latency or single points of failure if not paired with a stretched cluster, making it insufficient here.
Option B: Select two distant AZs and configure separate management workload domainsSeparate management workload domains in distant AZs decentralize management components (e.g., separate SDDC Managers, vCenters), violating the requirement for centralization. TheVCF 5.2 Administration Guidestates that multiple management domains increase complexity and don't inherently meet high availability SLAs without cross-site replication, ruling this out.
Option C: Implement VMware Live Recovery between the selected AZsVMware Live Recovery (part of VMware's DR portfolio, integrating Site Recovery Manager and vSphere Replication) provides disaster recovery across AZs. It ensures centralized management components (in one AZ) can fail over to a secondary AZ, maintaining an RTO/RPO that supports 99.99% availability when properly configured (e.g., <5-minute failover with replication). TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guiderecommends Live Recovery for multi-AZ resilience while keeping management centralized, making it a strong fit.
Option D: Implement separate VLANs for the infrastructure management components within each AZ Separate VLANs per AZ enhance network isolation but imply distributed management components across AZs, contradicting the centralized requirement. Even if management is centralized in one AZ, separate VLANs don't directly improve availability to 99.99% without HA or DR mechanisms, per theVCF 5.2 Networking Guide.
Option E: Select two close proximity AZs and configure a stretched management workload domainA stretched management workload domain spans two close AZs (e.g., <10ms latency) using vSphere HA, vSAN stretched clusters, and NSX federation. This keeps management components centralized (single SDDC Manager, vCenter) while achieving 99.99% availability through synchronous replication and automatic failover. TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guidehighlights stretched clusters as a best practice for multi-AZ designs, ensuring minimal downtime (e.g., seconds during host/AZ failure), meeting the SLA.
Conclusion:
C: VMware Live Recovery enables centralized management with DR failover, supporting 99.99% availability.
E: A stretched management domain in close AZs ensures centralized, highly available management with near- zero downtime.These decisions align with VCF 5.2 multi-AZ best practices.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Multi-AZ Design and Stretched Clusters.
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): Management Domain Resilience.
VMware Live Recovery Documentation(docs.vmware.com): DR for VCF Environments.

問題 #92
As part of a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) deployment, a customer is planning to implement vSphere IaaS control plane. What component could be installed and enabled to implement the solution?

A. Aria Automation
B. Aria Operations
C. NSX Edge networking
D. Storage DRS

答案：A

問題 #93
......

來吧，讓暴風雨來得更猛烈些吧！那些想通過IT認證的考生面臨那些考前準備將束手無策，但是又不得不準備，從而形成了那種急躁不安的心理狀態。不過，自從有了VCESoft VMware的2V0-13.24考試認證培訓資料，那種心態將消失的無蹤無影，因為有了VCESoft VMware的2V0-13.24考試認證培訓資料，他們可以信心百倍，不用擔心任何考不過的風險，當然也可以輕鬆自如的面對考試了，這不僅是心理上的幫助，更重要的是通過考試獲得認證，幫助他們拼一個美好的明天。

2V0-13.24考古題更新: https://www.vcesoft.com/2V0-13.24-pdf.html